Details pages -- conventions: Difference between revisions

From genomewiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Details pages should be consistent from track to track. To ease the burden on QA, developers are requested to: 1. html docs should conform to Jim's suggested 80-char width. 2. Un...)
 
(Replacing page with 'This page is no longer maintained.')
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Details pages should be consistent from track to track.
This page is no longer maintained.
To ease the burden on QA, developers are requested to:
 
 
1.  html docs should conform to Jim's suggested 80-char width.
 
 
2.  Units are separated from the numbers by a space:  "200 bp", not
"200bp".
 
 
3.  All references to websites not in our domain require the TARGET = _BLANK
tag.  We simply have to add it if y'all don't.
 
4.  Papers are referenced with outlinks in one place at the bottom of the
page only, not in the text above.  In the text we simply say something like
"Euskirchen, <EM> et al.</EM>, 2007".  Particularly if the paper is in
preprint or Epub, we then only have to change the ref in one place.
5.  Refs are in PubMed format.
 
6.  Refs with many authors are truncated to 10 authors and et al. (ital).

Latest revision as of 21:49, 10 March 2011

This page is no longer maintained.

Retrieved from "https://genomewiki.ucsc.edu/index.php?title=Details_pages_--_conventions&oldid=13254"