TRPV3: Difference between revisions
Tomemerald (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Introduction: This article evaluates a particular non-conservative change in the temperature-sensitve loop 2 of the gene TRPV3, the issue being whether the change is adaptive or ...") |
Tomemerald (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Introduction | == Introduction to TRPV3 Evolution == | ||
This article evaluates a particular non-conservative change in the temperature-sensitve loop 2 of the gene TRPV3, the issue being whether the change is adaptive or simply deleterious. | |||
The 200-odd articles on this gene are dwarfed by the some 4,000 on another member of this small gene family, TRPV1. The two genes are adjacent on human chromosome 17, suggesting a recent duplication that TRPV3 should be sistered with it in the gene tree history rather than with TRPV4 as sometimes suggested. Similarly TRPV5 and TRPV6 (76% identical) are paired up on chr 7 and quite distant from the other family members, so presumable basal. | |||
The duplication leading to TRPV3 has not been phylogenetically dated but if the natural signalling ligand of TRPV1 was capsaicin then too, then that also served initially for TRPV3 at the time of duplication (since the encoded proteins had not yet diverged), though it may have later diverged. | |||
Only TRPV2 and TRPV4 have determined PDB structures (2F37 and 4DX2 respectively). | |||
Using UCSC's GeneSorter, the number of coding exons varies within the gene family with 15 seemingly ancestral and TRPV3 quite anomalous at 17. However many refSeq models have historically been wrong so this requires manual confirmation. | |||
<pre> | |||
TRPV3 100 chr17:3413796 17 NM_001258205 | |||
TRPV1 45.8 chr17:3468740 15 NM_018727 | |||
TRPV4 45.9 chr12:110220892 15 NM_021625 | |||
TRPV2 41.2 chr17:16318856 14 NM_016113 | |||
TRPV6 30.4 chr7:142568960 15 NM_018646 | |||
TRPV5 30.5 chr7:142605648 15 NM_019841 | |||
</pre> | |||
Most TRPV3 research has been conducted in mouse. However as the figure below shows, all rodents but no lagomorphs or primates (or indeed any other tetrapod), have a threonine in place of ancestral lysine two residues over from the D <->N change of interest here. This threonine must represent an adaptive change because mouse diverged from rabbit perhaps 70 mya and the total rodent branch length over which the T was conserved might total 10x that -- too long for an amino acid to persist without supportive selective pressure against, among other possibilites, a return to K. | Most TRPV3 research has been conducted in mouse. However as the figure below shows, all rodents but no lagomorphs or primates (or indeed any other tetrapod), have a threonine in place of ancestral lysine two residues over from the D <->N change of interest here. This threonine must represent an adaptive change because mouse diverged from rabbit perhaps 70 mya and the total rodent branch length over which the T was conserved might total 10x that -- too long for an amino acid to persist without supportive selective pressure against, among other possibilites, a return to K. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 28: | ||
[[Image:TRPV3compGen.jpg]] | [[Image:TRPV3compGen.jpg]] | ||
=== Validating the gene model === | |||
=== Correcting the gene tree === | |||
=== Comparative genomics of loop 2's exon ==== | |||
[[Category:Comparative Genomics]] | [[Category:Comparative Genomics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:42, 10 October 2013
Introduction to TRPV3 Evolution
This article evaluates a particular non-conservative change in the temperature-sensitve loop 2 of the gene TRPV3, the issue being whether the change is adaptive or simply deleterious.
The 200-odd articles on this gene are dwarfed by the some 4,000 on another member of this small gene family, TRPV1. The two genes are adjacent on human chromosome 17, suggesting a recent duplication that TRPV3 should be sistered with it in the gene tree history rather than with TRPV4 as sometimes suggested. Similarly TRPV5 and TRPV6 (76% identical) are paired up on chr 7 and quite distant from the other family members, so presumable basal.
The duplication leading to TRPV3 has not been phylogenetically dated but if the natural signalling ligand of TRPV1 was capsaicin then too, then that also served initially for TRPV3 at the time of duplication (since the encoded proteins had not yet diverged), though it may have later diverged.
Only TRPV2 and TRPV4 have determined PDB structures (2F37 and 4DX2 respectively).
Using UCSC's GeneSorter, the number of coding exons varies within the gene family with 15 seemingly ancestral and TRPV3 quite anomalous at 17. However many refSeq models have historically been wrong so this requires manual confirmation.
TRPV3 100 chr17:3413796 17 NM_001258205 TRPV1 45.8 chr17:3468740 15 NM_018727 TRPV4 45.9 chr12:110220892 15 NM_021625 TRPV2 41.2 chr17:16318856 14 NM_016113 TRPV6 30.4 chr7:142568960 15 NM_018646 TRPV5 30.5 chr7:142605648 15 NM_019841
Most TRPV3 research has been conducted in mouse. However as the figure below shows, all rodents but no lagomorphs or primates (or indeed any other tetrapod), have a threonine in place of ancestral lysine two residues over from the D <->N change of interest here. This threonine must represent an adaptive change because mouse diverged from rabbit perhaps 70 mya and the total rodent branch length over which the T was conserved might total 10x that -- too long for an amino acid to persist without supportive selective pressure against, among other possibilites, a return to K.
Meanwhile lagomorphs (and other euchontoglires) continued with K suggesting supportive selective pressure against, among other possibilites, a change to T. This change on the rodent stem is a special case of a rodent synapomorphy, one that is phylogenetically coherent. (The genomic data is however weak -- only pika is available for lagomorphs as the rabbit genome is incomplete in this region.)
Along these same lines, the conserved N in first position in theran loop 2 is not ancestral; rather D/E is seen in monotremes, birds, turtle, lizard, frog, and basal fish. Again, this change is functionally signficant but this signficance is not understood.
